New Zealand History - The Truth 2

MOUNDS OF SECRET INFORMATION

Mounds of secret information, from many regions of New Zealand, remain under lock and key. Let's name a few items we'd like to see brought out into the light of day...If anyone, with specific information about a New Zealand archaeological "cover-up", would like to write in, we'll add your information or enquiry to the following thread:

In 1965 the Tameana and Hineana burial caves at Port Waikato were subjected to archaeological assessments. These were once home to the "tall ones", large stature, red headed people thought, in the 60's, to have originated in South America. Over the years much information had been learned about these people, including the fact that they made pottery (fragments of their pottery had been found). One report from the Port Waikato district spoke of a female skeleton, approaching 7 feet of height, with the male skeletons even taller. The remains of these tall people also included "red hair". They were once numerous, but were hunted to extinction by Maori cannibals. Many succumbed to lung ailments due to hiding in cold damp and dark conditions. Where are the official archaeological reports and photographs related to these types of remains and artifacts, accumulated over a long span of time? It's well known that these people existed...why is there a present restriction on talking about them in archaeological and historical circles?
When caverns are located containing these remains, as in recent years, why does DOC employ concealment teams and bring in bulldozers to hide all trace of the locations? Why not bring in scientists, archaeologists, physical anthropologists and the like to analyse the skeletons and associated artifacts? We are in contact with parties who were employed by DOC to conceal such burial sites.
About 1996 skeletal remains, described as being very ancient were found in a lava cavern near Wiri, South Auckland. Where is the archaeological report on this find and why did the initial newspaper article state that the remains were estimated to be about 2000 years old?
In the summer of 2000-2001 an ancient skeleton was located on the foreshore of Lake Pupuke in Auckland, N.Z. Where is it now? Were any photographs taken of the cranium and jawline? Was it examined by a physical anthropologist? Why did an officiating Kaumatua state that it was 3000 years old?
A little over 20 years ago there was a substantial landslip near the western shores of Lake Taupo. This occurrence was the result of incessant rains that had lashed the region for days on end. With the slippage of pumice ash, which had originally been dumped by the 186AD volcanic explosion of Taupo, a cavern mouth was exposed. Inside the cavern, officials and a volcanologist discovered the skeletal remains of people who had died as a result of the Taupo eruption. They had been living in the cave at the time, as artifacts and other evidence would suggest. But hold on a minute...there wasn't supposed to be anyone living in New Zealand in 186AD! Where is the archaeological report on this find, as well as the photographs and artifacts?
Why was the very comprehensive and utterly proven work of farmer/ archaeologist, Russell Price deliberately and unfairly torpedoed, without rational substance, by Dr. Bruce Mc Fadgen? The careful work undertaken by Price at Poukawa, between the 50's to the 70's, was fully endorsed by New Zealand's leading experts in the science of "ash band layering" (Pedologists)...individual of the calibre of Alan Pullar, along with highly respected colleagues, such as leading geologists Wellman, Kohn & Vucetich. They confirmed that Price had, indeed, found undeniable evidence of human occupation (artifacts and structures), which preceded both the Taupo volcanic explosion of 186AD, as well as the Waimiha volcanic explosion of 1320BC. Moa bones, found at very low levels below bands of "air layered" (volcanic) strata, had been both cooked, cut with tools and broken open for the extraction of marrow...sometime around 2500BC (see Chain of Evidence, by John Tasker, pages 138-155). Why has this astounding evidence been suppressed and ignored?
Where are the skeletons of women with long blond hair, extending to below their knees, found near Dargaville in the early 1900's? These were considered to be ancient and were located in a burial cave or grave when a road was being cut adjacent to the Wairoa river. Where is the report and were any photos taken?
Updated information: These two pre-colonial, European female skeletons were moved a short distance, amounting to only a couple of hundred yards, to the "pauper's section" of the Dargaville cemetery. There are approximately 50 bodies buried in that section and it would now, in all probability, be impossible to know which two skeletons were those of the pre-colonial European women. The discovery and reburial occurred in 1902. The two bodies were examined by Dr. Rata Norton who had worked in the district since 1872..ref. Noel Hilliam, Dargaville Maritime Museum Curator.

Where is the giant skeleton found near Mitimiti?
Where are the ancient Indo-European hair samples (wavy red and brown), originally 'obtained from a rock shelter near Waitakere'? These woven or platted samples were on display at the Auckland War Memorial Museum for many years and were written about by Maori Historian, Sir Peter Buck. Why don't we subject such samples to DNA analysis?
What did the Ngati-Whatua Iwi do with the 2 skeletons of Spanish conquistador soldiers, located on the western side of Potu Peninsula? The skeletal remains were exposed when heavy winds moved the sand dunes and the local police officer and other European officials were aware of this discovery. The bodies had helmets, breastplate armour and the remains of leather boots. They were handed over to the local Iwi and no further discussion has been forthcoming. Where is the archaeological report and photographs of this dynamic find? Is it true that the Ngati-Whatua Iwi hand around an ancient sword during Hui gatherings?
Why are we not allowed to do carbon dating and DNA analysis on ancient, non-Maori skeletal remains or the 200 year-old mummified, Indo-European head repatriated to New Zealand in 1998 from Britain by then Minister of Maori Affairs, Tau Henare?