ALL RISE FOR THE JUDGE!!

April 02, 2012

Here is why the judge said you may be found guilty even though you may not be ... Such is the way of the world. On the subject of courts and the prospect that 'He who does not deny - admits'. They are trying to use contract law. Now let’s get back to this court scenario. If the defendant does not rebut the unproved assumptions and presumptions then, according to the laws of procedure in an equity court, their failure to rebut them must mean what? THEY MUST BE TRUE BECAUSE YOU DIDN'T REBUT THEM!! Which under the terms of contract law, you have accepted the proposition. You didn't rebut them which is acceptance, Right? So, when you have offer and acceptance isn't that a contract? Doesn't that supersede any provisions required by formal law and procedure? YES, because the parties are in agreement!! And they can agree to waive remedies and provisions of law anytime they want. Now I said to these people that I knew that are confused as to why in the world the judge found the defendant guilty when the judge knew there was no evidence for the plaintiff in the case. I said he found the defendant guilty because he allowed and agreed that he should be found guilty. You volunteered.
After all, haven't you heard before that everybody in prison is there because they volunteered of their own free will? If you volunteered doesn't that mean you had a contract? Then WHAT'S THAT GOT TO DO WITH LAW?
The end result was there was no evidence to rebut the presumptions. So the defense rested. If the defense didn't rebut the presumptions, did the plaintiff have a duty to bring evidence into the case? OF COURSE NOT!!!
Because, they only have to bring evidence if the defendant rebuts the presumptions.
ALL RISE FOR THE JUDGE!! Okay? So here is what's going through the judges mind....he's going… “okay, there were charges of wrongdoing, there was no evidence by the state, but the defendants came on and didn’t rebut any of the charges...because they didn't rebut the charges...I, as the judge must weigh...well then, are the charges true as far as this case is concerned...or are the charges wrong?...as far as this case is concerned.”
It has to do with what’s the intent of the parties here...if there's no evidence...we can't rule on evidence...so it's not a law case. It's a case in equity...we want to know what the intent of the parties are...isn’t everybody out to gain all the news serviture?...because the news never gets to the facts...they just want to know how you feel about the news all the time. There's no facts before the court...there's no evidence before the court...we just want to know how everybody feels about it...do they want to be found guilty or not? And if they want to be found guilty...then we will go ahead and because we have their agreement...we'll find them guilty! The judge will sit back and he says, “well look...the charges, even though they're not proved...must be true.”

ALL RISE FOR THE JUDGE!!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright Free 2011 - Live Free New Zealand