Your mortgage/car loan/credit card

April 01, 2012

All the money in existence in our monetary systems has been borrowed at interest from a bank. When all currency in the system is borrowed at interest, there is NO MATHEMATICAL WAY to pay one penny of interest without pushing some people off the table via cancellation of their obligations to pay principal through bankruptcy, or through the kind of cancellation programs offered.

Reform must come from the side of dissatisfied customers, because the lenders have NO motivation to move away from their current position of power and influence. If people who favour the customer over the lender are able to use the law to stimulate change, any imbalance created by giving people their real estate for free will best correct itself through a change in banking laws and practice, NOT through perpetuation of the present system of GRAND THEFT of the entire wealth of society by the banking cartels.

Under the present system, someone HAS to get something for NOTHING. There is no other way.

Either the bankers continue to get interest payments for NOTHING at risk, or customers get free real estate after "borrowing" money that was created out of NOTHING and having the "loan" either cancelled for fraud, or discharged in bankruptcy, or the lender gets the real estate from the customer for NOTHING, following a foreclosure on the loan that was created out of NOTHING.

The answer is to stop basing bank lending on NOTHING.

Now lets get something straight...concerning the original instrument of indebtedness in its original form as noted in letter # 1.

A copy is not the original instrument of indebtedness...
Something purported to be signed at a later date is not the original instrument of indebtedness...
A copy from a fax is not the original instrument of indebtedness...
A certified true copy is not the original instrument of indebtedness...
A sworn affidavit claiming lost note does not issue, as the original instrument of indebtedness...
Anything produced that does not contain your DNA is not the original instrument of indebtedness...
When you signed it you had your hands on it, didn't you?

Now...let's move on to clarify just exactly what took place at the bank...
For illustrative purposes...
You walk into a bank and approach the counter with (2) $10.00 bills (notes).
You ask the young lady if she would kindly exchange these for a $20.00 bill (note)
You exchange your two pieces of paper (notes) for her one (note).
Did the bank give you a loan?

Same scenario...
You are seated across from the banker or bankers rep...
You sign a piece of paper (note) worth $130,000.00 and give it to him in exchange for a check (note) for $130,000.00

Did the bank give you a loan?
Neither the check nor the promissory note was legal tender at the time you exchanged notes.
You simply exchanged a note worth $130,000.00 for another note worth $130,000.00.

I fail to see the loan.
All you did was exchange notes.
But you say, Mary, who you bought the house from cashed the check and turned it into legal tender to spend.
Okay...and may I suggest the banker did the exact same thing.

The banker placed the note on his books as an asset and sold a security interest in the note to a third party for more than he paid for it.
So...I still do not see a loan, do you?

Now...lets examine the note the banker took from me in exchange for his check.
I'm going to suggest the banker endorsed the note by stamping the back of it thereby converting the mortgage into a bearer bond.
This is why the bank never brings the original blue-inked signed note to court....it is no longer a mortgage note...by conversion.
It is evidence the banker is no longer the holder in due course.
What banker is going to bring evidence to court showing you do not owe him anything?

No one understands money or the nature of banking and that's why they pull the wool over EVERYONES eyes.

And that’s why on November 1, 2007 in Cleveland Ohio 14 people in foreclosure walked out of court in possession of their homes with NO ONE to make their payments to.

The bank could not produce evidence they were indeed in possession of the note at the time they filed the foreclosure.

No bank can.

No note=no standing=case dismissed.

What I suggest to anyone is that they look very closely at letter #1 where all one is seeking is an accounting of the mortgage this is the important part and the banks assurance they will return the note in exchange for payment.

After letter #1 is sent, the bank usually sends you an accounting of the total including any penalties.

But,....99.999999% of the time, the bank never gives you their assurance they will return the note in exchange for payment.

Pursuant to the laws of the Canada/USA/UK/NZ that is known as "refusing to accept payment".

Now I don't know about you but, if I owed you $100 and I signed an (iou) note to pay you back and a week later I offered to pay you in exchange for the evidence of indebtedness (iou) whereby you, refused to return the note upon accepting payment then do you think you could come back in a month and demand payment?

The difficult hump to overcome by anyone attempting to comprehend money and banking is laid bare in the indisputable fact of truth that no financial institution has ever lent a consumer one single $1.00.

O yes...I have heard it all to the point when it comes down to showing the detractors their flimsy arguments to this are based on nothing, but erroneous assumptions, presumptions and of course...red herrings thrown in as a last resort.

Jesus said,
Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison. (Matthew 5:25)

Example of agreeing with thine adversary along the way...

From: ____________________
Date: ____________________
To: ____________________
Re: ___(Credit Card, bank loan, mortgage, etc.)
Account Number:___________
To Whom it may concern:
I would like to make arrangements to settle the above referenced matter.

Please provide me with your statement of the amount owing as of ___(pick date 2 weeks out for example)___, together with your assurance that you will accept payment in direct and immediate exchange for the original instrument of indebtedness in its original form.
Thank you very much.
___________________________
by: authorized party

Under NZ legislation, they must provide you with the iou on your payment. They will refuse, or offer you a copy or something else, but they will not assure you of the original instrument of indebtedness. In essence, they will refuse your offer to settle your loan… under NZ legislation that is akin to saying; the debt did not exist in the first instance!

 

News items listed
Freeman Sites
Bank Fraud
NZ Flag 1835
Electric car demise
Reserve Bank beginning
World Freeman Society
Ask Your Bank 11/11/11
Reserve Bank - Open Bank Resolution
Tax Return returned
Foreshore and Seabed
Global Transaction Tax
Skin Cancer
How I clobbered bureaucratic cash..
Vatican Calls 'Central World Bank'
Rampart Productions
RBNZ Covered Bonds
Blank of Ireland
Write off your debts for free
John Key Exposed
The Wayseer Manifesto
Would you vote John Key?
Collapse of Paper Money
Save the Internet
When Money became God
Food Bill 160-2
Mortgage Strike
Free the Planet
New Food Bill
Countering Propaganda
Money and the Blame Game
Te Kooti
NZ Reports - US Securities
The Wolf is at the Door
Rob McCall newsletter
Claim of Right
A voice of Australia
Codex Alimentarius
NZ Food Bill Info
Food Shortages & Riots
"The Truth ..." Jack; Slevkoff
Former farming leader evicted
Affidavit of Truth
Unfiltered News
To kill Cancer
Freedom Force
Mary Croft
Mortgaged? Help is here
Write off your debts for free
NZ Bill 324-1: $50000 fine for tea?
Who will challenge Reserve Bank ?
Do words enslave us?
People Power in the Court
"Freeman Movement"
Robert Menard - Interview
Preparing Your Child
Article 61 of Magna Carta
Rob McCalls Granny's ...
The next year (or so)
Tsunami of Resignations
Drop out - like a boss
Trusts
SA - Tellinger
Politics Attracts Corrupt People
Murder Pike River Mine
THE BIG CASE
Cornerstone of Constitutional Court Case
Your mortgage/car loan/credit card
All Rise For The Judge
All Forms of Taxation are Theft!!
Money - A balancing act pdf
Money - A balancing act
Fantastic News!
SA - Tellinger 2
Grim thought from Gulag
Iceland and SA in World Banking
The collapse of fake money empire
Local Council debt - "Agenda 21"
Australian resistance to the NWO
Beyond Incorporation of New Zealand
The Credit River decision
Troubling Secret Partnership
FLORA News
Protect marriage NZ
The Opal File
HCC & Agenda 21
Bank of England - Hidden Origins
Fisherman refuses fees payment
How, Why Fight ALL Fines
Ignorance begets slavery
NZ Police a private company
Story NOT TOLD on 6.00pm news!
To good to ignore ..
A Great Victory
Agenda 21 - Video links
Boxing poster 4 Dec NO TPPA Event
Say no to the TPPA
ITU wants total internet control
4m+ Kiwis losing MRP
Cyprus-style solution for NZ
Politics or Felony ?
NZ History - An Unpalatable Truth
NZ History - Mounds of Secret Information
NZ History - The White Ngati-Hotu
NZ History - The Surveyors
NZ History - Caucasoid "Moa-hunter" bones
NZ History - History of moko tattoo design
NZ History - The Kaimanawa Wall
NZ History - Ancient Maori Red Hair
NZ History - Maui - Maori mythology or fact?
NZ History - Koru PA New Plymouth
NZ History - European Patu-paiarehe people
NZ History - The Tiki Myth
NZ History - The Ancient Population
NZ History - Journal Of Polynesian Society
NZ History - Waka Blonds
NZ History - Ancient song by Nga-Puhi